Google Gemini Prompt Guide: How to Write Prompts That Actually Work

Google Gemini Prompt Guide: How to Write Prompts That Actually Work

Two prompts that look almost the same can produce wildly different answers. I’ve seen it in newsroom tests, marketing teams see it daily, and product managers complain about it in meetings. The fix isn’t magic. It’s structure. If you give Google Gemini the right framing, it returns focused, consistent work instead of lucky guesses.

By Arvind

The anatomy of a high‑performing Gemini prompt

Most strong prompts have four parts: persona, task, context, and format. You can think of these as role, goal, fuel, and shape. Miss one, and you’ll likely get generic output.

Persona (role): Tell Gemini who it is. This sets tone, depth, and vocabulary. Example: “You are a senior content strategist for a global travel brand.” That one line pushes the model to think like a pro, not a hobby blogger.

Task (goal): Be explicit about what you want. “Generate five blog ideas” is fine. “Generate five blog ideas for frequent business travelers that are timely, data-backed, and not basic tips” is better. Add constraints you care about: time frame, originality, difficulty, length, or audience level.

Context (fuel): Give background the model can use. Audience, brand voice, product facts, limits, what to avoid, and examples of what “good” looks like. If it matters, include it. If it doesn’t, drop it—noise dilutes the answer.

Format (shape): Tell Gemini exactly how to present the output. If you want a table-like layout, numbered list, sections with headers, or a short abstract plus bullet points, say so. If you need character counts, add them.

Put together, a solid skeleton looks like this:

  • Persona: “You are a B2B SaaS product marketer.”
  • Task: “Write a 150-word announcement email for a new analytics feature.”
  • Context: “Target: operations managers at mid-sized retailers; Tone: confident and specific; Must include: one benefit, one proof point, one CTA.”
  • Format: “Subject line + 3-paragraph body + CTA on a new line.”

Here’s a concrete template you can reuse:

“You are [role/persona]. Your job: [task]. Audience: [who]. Voice: [tone/style]. Constraints: [must include/avoid]. Use inputs: [data, facts, URLs you will summarize, or examples pasted below]. Output format: [structure, length, sections, bullets].”

Example prompt—content ideation:

“You are a content strategist for a premium luggage brand. Task: Generate 7 fresh blog topics for frequent business travelers flying twice a month or more. Context: The brand voice is practical and premium; audience wants time-saving, security, and durability tips; avoid cliches like ‘pack light’. Include a one-line angle for each idea and a quick note on why it’s timely in 2025. Format: Numbered list.”

Example prompt—email writing:

“You are a customer success lead at a fintech startup. Task: Draft a polite but firm payment reminder email. Context: Invoice #8743 is 15 days overdue; average payment window is 30 days; we value long-term relationships. Tone: respectful, clear, and specific. Include subject line options (3), a short body, and a direct payment link placeholder. Format: Subject options, then email body.”

Example prompt—analysis/summarization:

“You are a research analyst. Task: Summarize the following 1,200-word report for an executive who has 60 seconds. Context: Focus on 3 findings, 2 risks, 1 action. Tone: neutral, concise. Format: 6 bullet points total. Paste any numbers exactly as written.”

Example prompt—coding/specs:

“You are a senior Python developer. Task: Write a function that ingests a CSV of orders and returns revenue by week. Context: Input columns: order_id, order_date (ISO), amount (USD). Edge cases: missing dates, negative amounts. Constraints: include docstring, type hints, and one unit test. Format: code block followed by a brief explanation.”

Notice the pattern: one role, one clear task, rich context, strict format. That’s the basic recipe behind reliable prompt engineering.

Negative guidance helps too. If there’s something you don’t want—no made-up stats, no overuse of emojis, no generic advice—say it. “Do not invent sources” and “If uncertain, ask clarifying questions” are two simple guardrails that improve quality.

And keep an eye on length. Long context is fine if it’s relevant. If it’s not, trim it. Models pay attention to what you emphasize. Put the most important facts near the top, and label sections clearly: “Facts,” “Tone,” “Format.”

Practical workflows, AI Studio, and fixes when things go wrong

Practical workflows, AI Studio, and fixes when things go wrong

Google AI Studio gives you a quick way to test and refine prompts without juggling different tools. The flow is simple: click “Create Prompt,” try a suggested prompt or paste your own, run it, tweak a line, run again. Edits and versions autosave so you can return to what worked.

A fast iteration loop looks like this:

  1. Draft a first prompt with the four-part structure.
  2. Run it. Skim the output. What’s off—tone, facts, depth, or format?
  3. Tighten constraints. Add examples. Move must-have details to the top.
  4. Run again with a small change. Compare. Keep the better version.
  5. Repeat until the output reads like something you’d ship without heavy editing.

Tip: Keep a “prompt library” inside AI Studio or your notes app. Save winners for common tasks—emails, briefs, summaries, bug reports, data checks. You’ll save hours later.

Here are ready-to-use templates across common jobs:

  • Product brief: “You are a product manager. Task: Write a one-pager. Audience: execs and engineering. Context: [problem, users, goals, metrics, constraints]. Format: Sections for Problem, Target User, Use Cases, Success Metrics, Risks, Open Questions.”
  • Social copy: “You are a social editor. Task: Draft 5 platform-specific posts for the same story. Context: Brand voice: [tone]. Provide a unique hook for each platform (LinkedIn, X, Instagram, YouTube). Format: Bulleted list labeled by platform; max character counts.”
  • Meeting notes: “You are a note-taker. Task: Turn the transcript below into readable minutes. Format: Decisions, Action Items with owners and dates, Open Questions, Key Quotes. Remove filler.”
  • Bug triage: “You are an engineering lead. Task: Classify and prioritize the following bug reports. Format: Table-like bullets: ID, Severity (P0–P3), Impact, Repro Steps, Owner Suggestion.”

Multilingual prompts need extra care. If you’re working in Hindi or Urdu, name the exact variant and region. Say “Hindi (India) in Devanagari script” or “Urdu (Pakistan) in Nastaliq style.” If you want Hinglish, say “Write in Hinglish using Latin script.” Add a short style note: “Keep grammar simple, avoid formal honorifics.” If Gemini misreads the language, set the language at the top of the prompt and include a one-line example to anchor it.

Examples:

  • “Language: Hindi (India), Devanagari. Audience: tier-1 city professionals. Tone: practical, modern. Avoid overly formal words like ‘कृपया’ unless necessary.”
  • “Language: Urdu (Pakistan), Nastaliq style. Audience: small business owners. Tone: warm, plain. Avoid mixing English unless required for product names.”

When results are weak, the problem is usually the prompt, not the model. Diagnose like this:

  • Generic output? Add a tighter persona and richer context. Provide examples of what you like and dislike.
  • Wrong tone? Paste a short style sample and tell Gemini to mimic it. Label it clearly as “Style Sample.”
  • Hallucinated facts? Paste the source material and add “Do not invent facts. If missing, ask for more info.” Force citations to your pasted context.
  • Messy structure? Specify headings, bullets, and character counts. Tell it to include only what you asked for.
  • Too long or short? Set hard limits: “Max 120 words,” or “Three bullets only.”

Here’s a simple rewrite exercise that shows how a few edits fix most issues.

Weak prompt: “Write a blog post about remote work tips.”

Stronger prompt: “You are a workplace productivity coach. Task: Write a 600-word blog post with 7 practical remote work tips for first-time managers. Context: Audience works across 3 time zones; tools: Slack, Google Meet; common issues: meeting overload, unclear goals. Tone: friendly but direct. Format: H2 title, intro (70–90 words), 7 numbered tips with one example each, final checklist.”

Want to go deeper? Try multi-step prompting. Break a big task into stages and keep the same persona across steps.

  1. Brainstorm: “Generate 10 sharp angles for a feature on electric scooters in Indian cities. Avoid safety lectures and focus on infrastructure and cost.”
  2. Select: “Pick the best 3 based on novelty and data availability. Explain why in one line each.”
  3. Outline: “Create a section-by-section outline for the strongest angle with estimated word counts.”
  4. Draft: “Write the first 500 words in a crisp newsroom style. No fluff.”
  5. Polish: “Tighten the language. Remove clichés. Keep sentences under 20 words.”

Role-play is another useful trick when you need pushback. Ask Gemini to challenge your plan:

“You are a skeptical CFO. Task: Challenge the marketing plan below. Find weak assumptions, missing costs, and unrealistic timelines. Format: Bullets labeled Assumption, Risk, Fix.”

Pair prompts with examples—few-shot prompting—when style matters. Give two short samples you love, label them “Example A” and “Example B,” then say “Mimic the tone and structure of A and B. Do not copy their wording.” Two clean examples teach style better than a paragraph of adjectives.

For complex projects, bake in checks and questions:

  • “If any requirement conflicts, ask two clarifying questions before writing.”
  • “List the assumptions you’re making at the top.”
  • “Flag any missing data you need.”

Remember, prompts are instructions, not wishes. The more your prompt reads like a tight creative brief, the better the output will be.

Here’s a compact checklist you can keep by your keyboard:

  • Persona: Did I define who Gemini is?
  • Task: Is the goal specific and scoped?
  • Context: Did I add facts, audience, voice, and constraints?
  • Format: Did I specify structure and length?
  • Negatives: Did I forbid halos like invented stats?
  • Examples: Did I include a style or content sample?
  • Review: Is the most important info at the top?

Now apply it to three common workstreams.

Business comms—client update email:

“You are an account manager at a digital agency. Task: Write a weekly client update. Context: Campaign: ‘Spring Launch’; KPIs: CTR +18% WoW, CPA -9%; risks: inventory constraints in Tier-2 cities. Tone: calm, proactive. Format: Subject line, 4 short sections—Wins, Data, Risks, Next Week—with bullets; 150–180 words.”

Creative ideation—short video scripts:

“You are a creative director making 15-second reels for a travel brand. Task: Write 5 concepts with a hook in first 2 seconds, one visual gag, and a budget under ₹20,000 per video. Audience: professionals 25–40 planning quick breaks. Format: Numbered list with Hook, Visual, Line, CTA.”

Strategy—OKR draft:

“You are a head of operations. Task: Draft Q4 OKRs for customer support. Context: Targets: reduce first-response time from 18m to 8m, improve CSAT from 4.2 to 4.5, cut escalations by 20%. Constraints: no headcount increase. Format: 3 Objectives, each with 3 Key Results, measurable and time-bound.”

If you’re getting partial answers or Gemini keeps skipping sections, try this enforcement pattern:

“Output must include the following sections in this exact order: A, B, C. If any section lacks data, write ‘[Need input]’ and list 2 questions.”

And if you need to keep the model on a single voice across a long chat, anchor it with a mini style guide at the top: three bullets on tone, three on sentence length and vocabulary, and two on what to avoid. Paste it once and reference it: “Use the style guide above.”

Finally, sanity checks reduce cleanup time:

  • Numbers: “Echo all figures exactly; do not round unless asked.”
  • Dates: “Use ISO format (YYYY-MM-DD) unless the audience is consumer-facing.”
  • Citations: “If a claim isn’t in the provided sources, label it as opinion or ask for a source.”
  • Bias: “Use inclusive language; avoid stereotypes.”

Gemini keeps improving, but the fundamentals don’t change. Give it a clear role, a crisp job, real context, and a strict format. Iterate quickly in AI Studio. Save your winners. And when a response misses, diagnose, tighten, and run it again. That’s how you turn a smart model into a dependable teammate.